Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

Mike Connor

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by Mike Connor » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:25 am

I have not used them yet, although they are supposed to be good. I will try these next;

http://www.yellowstoneangler.com/staff- ... ding-boots

It will certainly be a while before I can report on them, but I have made a couple of sets. Ordinary aluminium strip works fine and is a lot cheaper than buying them ready made.
Mataura mayfly
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:28 am
Location: Southland, South Island, New Zealand.

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by Mataura mayfly » Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:11 pm

I have not tried aluminium bars of any variety yet, either permanent fixture or slip on "crampon" style, but when you do Mike and have tested them for a while- I would be very interested in your findings or your take on noise vibration transmission from them and your ability to stalk up to trout from behind in their "blind spot" while wearing them.
If you ever get the chance to witness a rugby team wearing boots tagged with large aluminium sprigs as they transfer from a concrete path to the grass playing field, you will get some idea of the noise I am talking about.
If you stalk trout in quiet water it is very hard to go past felt for stealth, rubber soles are not bad- but are not as secure on slimy rock as felt, nor will they ever be, add any metal to the bottom of the sole and you will transmit noise underwater. You may not hear it from above- but trout sure do pick it up and it does not have to be a sole drag over rock, lifting and placing a studded sole carefully will create noise that trout can hear/feel.
If you just wade into position and cast likely looking water, or there is a lot of turbulent water noise where you are wading, it may not be a problem. Stalking up on trout in quiet water while sight fishing- it can be.
"Listen to the sound of the river and you will get a trout".... Irish proverb.
User avatar
hankaye
Posts: 6582
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Arrey, N.M. aka 32°52'37.63"N, 107°18'54.18"W

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by hankaye » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:03 pm

Mataura mayfly, Howdy;

Sound travels about 4.3 times faster in water (depends on temp. fresh or salt),
so that's always something I been apt to consider when wading.

Mike C. please keep us in the loop with your investigation of these bars.

hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949...
"Every day I beat my own previous record for number
of consecutive days I've stayed alive." George Carlin
Mike Connor

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by Mike Connor » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:18 pm

hankaye wrote:Mataura mayfly, Howdy;

Sound travels about 4.3 times faster in water (depends on temp. fresh or salt),
so that's always something I been apt to consider when wading.

Mike C. please keep us in the loop with your investigation of these bars.

hank
Agreed, that is my own major reservation about any metal at all on boots. Even turbulent water wont help much if you scrape metal on rock, it is a sound that fish are particularly sensitive to and they routinely filter most other "standard" water noise anyway, they have to or their senses would be overwhelmed in any sort of turbulence, they have no trouble at all reacting to metal on rock. You can test this easily, just drag a metal tipped wading staff over a rock,even directly below a waterfall and watch fish shoot away ( assuming you are in the right position to do so, which is admittedly not always very easy to find). I have observed this often after finding a few places where I could. I prefer to stay out of the water altogether on rivers if I can manage it. Athough I used to do a lot of wading I do a lot less nowadays.

However, in saltwater I often fish over rock, and the added security is important to me. I once fell on some rock on the Danish coast and hit my knee so badly that I had to crawl to my car which was quite a way away. Had it been much further I might not have made it, I would probably have frozen to death as it was very cold at the time. So I am particularly anxious not to do anything like that ever again. I was wearing felts at the time.

The aluminium bars do seem very promising as far as secure ( or at least "better") footing is concerned but I don't think they will be any better than any other metal as far as stealth is concerned. So it's a compromise at best.

As soon as I have any useful information at all I will post it.
User avatar
Eric Peper
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Austin, TX and Island Park, ID

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by Eric Peper » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:12 pm

I truly love my Danner River Grippers. They are very comfortable, easy on-and-off (provided they're wet), and very secure footing. Regrettably, they are apparently the equivalent of a ghetto boombox underwater. The Henry's Fork is weedy, and so long as I am able to keep my feet on the weeds rather than the rocks, we don't have a problem. But once one of those nasty little studs scrapes a rock, if there is a fish within 40 feet, the stalk is over. Adios riser.

Eric
A mountain is a fact -- a trout is a moment of beauty known only to men who seek them.
Al McClane in his Introduction to The Practical Fly Fisherman . . . often erroneously attributed to Arnold Gingrich
zen leecher
Posts: 998
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:11 pm
Location: Moses Lake, WA

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by zen leecher » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:59 pm

zen leecher wrote:Greetings, I'm new here and wondered where I'd place my first post.

When I worked I hung around with engineers too long but I have a business background. There's been some talk about outlawing felts in WA state so when I was getting new waders I also got new boots. I couldn't find the Simms studs anywhere but did notice the price (business background). The part that hung around the engineers too long got me to go to the local metal store and buy about 80 little sheet metal screws. Couldn't figure out where the best spots on the boot bottoms were and I didn't want to slip so I put one in every little spot. (OC part of me). I got the 80 sheet metal screws for $2-$3 and on the one trip I was out they grabbed better than my old felt boots.

Ron Eagle Elk pointed me to this forum.

Bill W
My second post: I had someone from this forum suggest I had used too many sheet metal screws and stood the chance of separating my soles. Also had a Simms rep confirm this. Dang... I thought O.C. was the way to go and follow what the "voices" told me to do. I will now remove most of the screws.
Mataura mayfly
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:28 am
Location: Southland, South Island, New Zealand.

Re: Fishing Wingless Wets, Without Felt ....

Post by Mataura mayfly » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:43 pm

Back in the day, many back country hunters and fishers (often one in the same person) had but one pair of boots for all purposes. Usually these boots were leather uppers and leather soles resplendent with horse shoe hobnails. For extra grip on moss or ice covered rock tricouni plates were often added.

Image

Once the screw on rubber "commando" sole became popular the hobnails were dispensed with, but often the tricouni remained- just less of them- often just the pair on either side of the instep in front of the heel block and maybe a single on the front of the toe curve.
Yes, they were noisy, but they were very good at slicing through slime or ice and gripping on rock.
"Listen to the sound of the river and you will get a trout".... Irish proverb.
Post Reply