Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by William Anderson » Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:05 am

Another from the wallet. This is a body of pale red fox dubbing prespun on white silk and wrapped in touching turns over a brown tying thread base. All of these tones really come together when it's wet. When I get back to the vise I need to spend more time with this white silk and I'll try to get some wet tank shots of these. There is also a sparse shuck of very fine snowshoe underfur fibers.


Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph:


Image



Image
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
Old Hat
Posts: 4204
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Where Deet is a Cologne
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by Old Hat » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:42 am

Meticulous dubbing William. Doesn't get any better. I would like to know if the snowshoe out the back changes the natural orientation of the fly when underwater. i.e. Does the fly sink butt or head first?
I hate it when I think I'm buying organic vegetables, and when I get home I discover they are just regular donuts.
http://www.oldhatflytying.com
User avatar
tie2fish
Posts: 5072
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:11 am
Location: Harford County, MD

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by tie2fish » Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:50 am

Even dry, that really has the requisite "buggy" look that attracts fish, w. IMO the trailing shuck does not detract from its classification as a flymph. Given JL's purported attention to the details he observed in streamside nature, I am a bit puzzled by the seeming lack of trailing shucks on his flies; this characteristic is quite common and readily observable during the nymph-to-dun stage of several species. But In his defense (as though he needs it ;)), he did not have Z-lon or poly yarn to work with.
Some of the same morons who throw their trash around in National parks also vote. That alone would explain the state of American politics. ~ John Gierach, "Still Life with Brook Trout"
User avatar
letumgo
Site Admin
Posts: 13346
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Buffalo, New York
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by letumgo » Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:09 pm

Marvelous pattern William.
Ray (letumgo)----<°))))))><
http://www.flytyingforum.com/index.php? ... er=letumgo

"The world is perfect. Appreciate the details." - Dean
User avatar
NJpatbee
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: Ocean County NJ

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by NJpatbee » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:09 pm

Excellent looking fly - it looks alive dry, curious to see it wet.
User avatar
hankaye
Posts: 6582
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Arrey, N.M. aka 32°52'37.63"N, 107°18'54.18"W

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by hankaye » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:55 pm

dub-ya, Howdy;

The amount of "neatness" that you display sometimes intimidates me. But that's a good thing. ;)
Have you scrubbed one of them with a brush yet?
Looking forward to a wet photo or 3 or more... :)

hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949...
"Every day I beat my own previous record for number
of consecutive days I've stayed alive." George Carlin
User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by William Anderson » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:02 pm

Old Hat wrote:Meticulous dubbing William. Doesn't get any better. I would like to know if the snowshoe out the back changes the natural orientation of the fly when underwater. i.e. Does the fly sink butt or head first?
Carl, that's a fair question and I expect it wouldn't but I haven't dipped this in a glass with a leader to notice. It's a good idea. I can't imagine it would fish better or worse with some fluctuation, but I would like to know. Or will the shuck retain significant hydrofuge which would effect the pitch of the fly and its appearance. I suspect if any, not much, but it wouldn't be the first time I was surprised by a dunk test.

I've wet these to see the body's color change but it sounds like a few dunk tests are in order. Soon. I hope soon.
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by William Anderson » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:22 pm

tie2fish wrote:Even dry, that really has the requisite "buggy" look that attracts fish, w. IMO the trailing shuck does not detract from its classification as a flymph. Given JL's purported attention to the details he observed in streamside nature, I am a bit puzzled by the seeming lack of trailing shucks on his flies; this characteristic is quite common and readily observable during the nymph-to-dun stage of several species. But In his defense (as though he needs it ;)), he did not have Z-lon or poly yarn to work with.

Bill, I wouldn't disqualify it as a flymph either, based on Hidy's definition. Flymphs have tails and not. I know we look back at some wet fly patterns and spiders and sometimes impose an interpretation of their meeting the attributes of emergers, but as that term was not in use, the addition of a shuck would have been a surprise. I wonder when the first shucks were added?
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by William Anderson » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:28 pm

hankaye wrote:dub-ya, Howdy;

The amount of "neatness" that you display sometimes intimidates me. But that's a good thing. ;)
Have you scrubbed one of them with a brush yet?
Looking forward to a wet photo or 3 or more... :)

hank
Hank, of all the neat-nics on this board, I know my ranking is safely in double digits. :D

The question about the brushing is interesting. I hadn't planned on it. I do cut up the red fox for dubbing into ¼" or larger lengths, but it's such a fine, soft material, like mole but longer and finer so it binds to the silk and lacks that wily, spikey effect of many dubbings. I like this for a tan caddis. I'll have to fish these more this season and report back.
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
Old Hat
Posts: 4204
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Where Deet is a Cologne
Contact:

Re: Waterhen and Red Fox Flymph

Post by Old Hat » Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:59 pm

I was just curious because of the floating properties of snowshoe hare feet. But going back and reading your post you said underfur, I just glazed over that and stuck snowshoe hare foot in my mind. I wouldn't expect the underfur to effect it much either.

There are a lot of patterns that are very effective with the shucks. Shane Stalcup used a lot of shucks in his pattern designs. He had all kinds of different shucks that he used.
I hate it when I think I'm buying organic vegetables, and when I get home I discover they are just regular donuts.
http://www.oldhatflytying.com
Post Reply