Page 1 of 2

Tying Question

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:21 pm
by dj1212
Noticed a couple flies in one of the old North country pattern lists that call for a dubbed hurl (sp. herl?) body. Does this mean the standard method of twisting together feather fibers and winding up the hook or something else? Thanks.

Love this forum!

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 7:18 am
by Old Hat
Usually this was done by twisting the herl with the thread and wrapping that way. Many contemporary tiers will wrap the herl then rib with the thread.

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 8:25 am
by tie2fish
I think, although I could be wrong, that the term "dubbed" in the early literature was a general term that meant "applied to the hook" (or thread) without specifying exactly how it was to be done. Perhaps tiers of the day had a technique for doing this with herl of all types that they all understood and practiced; what Carl describes would seem to be the most logical way.

Re: Tyinng Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:01 am
by wsbailey
This book might help with your question.

https://books.google.com/books?id=Nd6Ac ... &q&f=false

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:44 am
by tie2fish
wsbailey wrote: Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:01 am This book might help with your question.

https://books.google.com/books?id=Nd6Ac ... &q&f=false
The definition of "dub" used as a verb given in this reference book certainly reinforces the meaning that most of us think of, but it does not address the use of the word when applied to applying herl to a hook shank.

When I first saw this tying instruction in an old recipe several years ago, I actually thought it might mean applying the beautiful green leavings from stripping a peacock herl to a thread using tacky wax. Take my word for it -- this doesn't work very well.

I have since interpreted "dubbed with peacock (or heron or whatever) herl" to mean wrapping it around the hook shank, whether that be alone or with some form of reinforcement. I am most certainly open to being corrected.

Re: Tyinng Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:04 am
by wsbailey
From "A Treatise of Fishing with an Angle"

These are the 12 flies with which you shall angle for trout and grayling. You shall dub them as follows. (dress)

The black leaper. the body of black wool and lapped about with the herl of the peacock tail: and the wings of the red capon with a blue head. (technique)

http://www.hagstone.net/bernersmay3.jpg

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:38 am
by letumgo
dj1212 - FIrst off, welcome aboard. I'm delighted you've jump right into the conversation.

Do you know the name of the pattern where you saw the dubbed herl listed? We might be able to be more specific if you could provide a picture or link to the pattern.

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:45 pm
by hankaye
dj1212, Howdy;

Welcome to the forum! Good to see the gene pool is growing.

As Ray mentioned, good to see a new member jump into the forum with questions,
keeps us from getting stale and rutted. Be sure to explore all the different forums
contained herein, and be on the look out for a sub forum from one of the bottom listed
on the main page.

hank

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:55 pm
by wsbailey
A lot of Pritt's are dubbed with herl - peacock, magpie and heron etc.

Re: Tying Question

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:32 pm
by dj1212
"When I first saw this tying instruction in an old recipe several years ago, I actually thought it might mean applying the beautiful green leavings from stripping a peacock herl to a thread using tacky wax. Take my word for it -- this doesn't work very well."

This is exactly why I asked this question! I have always tied in herl by twisting the long feather fibers with the thread and wrapping up the hook. When I saw the term dubbed with herl I wondered if what you describe above is the method they were describing. I think one of the old black Gnat patterns calls for the thread to be sparsly dubbed with black herl. I was just curious what others thought of this.

Thanks for the replies.