 
   
   
   
   
 hank
I think my lower jaw may come up from the floor somtime next week
Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo
 
   
   
   
   
  
  ) it would be interesting to compare the effectiveness of these "full dress" flymphs with those tied with the classic spider components of hook/thread/hackle.  What I suspect is that while the former might look more "natural" to us, the flicker and flutter of the spider would take more fish, if only because there are fewer things to go wrong.  For instance, the orange floss softie that Ray just posted would probably out fish my "salmon" pattern 10-1, and he wouldn't have to switch to a bass-bug taper to get it on the water.
 ) it would be interesting to compare the effectiveness of these "full dress" flymphs with those tied with the classic spider components of hook/thread/hackle.  What I suspect is that while the former might look more "natural" to us, the flicker and flutter of the spider would take more fish, if only because there are fewer things to go wrong.  For instance, the orange floss softie that Ray just posted would probably out fish my "salmon" pattern 10-1, and he wouldn't have to switch to a bass-bug taper to get it on the water. 
Ditto. I'm just thoroughly impressed with the whole bunch. I'm sure you won't have any trouble finding a few folks to conduct your comparison field study. My address is...tie2fish wrote:This whole series has been pretty amazing right from the start, but these last three are simply killer dressings. The first really new technique I've seen in a while. Steelhead for sure, landlocks are probable, striped bass when tied in larger sizes, maybe even marlin ... ? The potential is staggering.
 
 


 At any rate, I was surprised by how well-behaved the starling/herl twist was--not nearly as fragile as I'd feared.  If I fished to midges, I could definitely see a Stewart's Spider/Grifith's Gnat mash-up, or, if I could get ahold of those nifty Waspi eye-sticks in "sulphur," I'd definitely be inclined to try a light-colored emerger like this one.
   At any rate, I was surprised by how well-behaved the starling/herl twist was--not nearly as fragile as I'd feared.  If I fished to midges, I could definitely see a Stewart's Spider/Grifith's Gnat mash-up, or, if I could get ahold of those nifty Waspi eye-sticks in "sulphur," I'd definitely be inclined to try a light-colored emerger like this one. 
Ha, William--I should have warned those of a traditionalist bent to avert their eyes.What was the under-hackle on this one?
 At any rate, that's a starling underhackle and a conventionally hackled partridge feather in front--I'd call it a Greenwell's flymph, but that would be wrong.  Very wrong.
  At any rate, that's a starling underhackle and a conventionally hackled partridge feather in front--I'd call it a Greenwell's flymph, but that would be wrong.  Very wrong.  Might fish it it to a Quill Gordon hatch this spring, though....
  Might fish it it to a Quill Gordon hatch this spring, though.... 